|Introduction to EMAH (full text without introduction), the Even More Astonishing Hypothesis* - AI and the deconstruction of the brain by Peter Klevius|
|* compare Francis Crick's The Astonishing Hypothesis|
|Do you believe in Freud? See timeline describing his lifelong and populist "scientific" defense of sex segregation and how he treated/limited his wife!
KLEVIUS' INTERDISCIPLINARY NEWS BLOG: Increase in the dehumanization of women in mainly Muslim countries
KLEVIUS' ANTI SEX SEGREGATION BLOG
|Basic Concepts in Depth|
|Psycho State Marries the Social State|
|Main page with World Values Survey
Did Bush & Condy get it right after all?
|by P. Klevius|
|Klevius' definition of religion
Inside Klevius' mind
Translation from Resursbegär (Demand for Resources 1992 p 32-33).
A critique of Habermas' dichotomy observing/understanding:
observing a stone = perception understood by the viewer
I observe a stone = utterance that is intelligible for an other person
Although I assume that Habermas would consider the latter example communication because of an allusion (via the language) to the former, I would argue that this "extension" of the meaning of the utterance cannot be demonstrated as being essentially different from the original observation/understanding. Consequently there exists no "abstract" meaning of symbols, which fact of course eliminates the symbol itself. The print color/waves (sound or light etc) of the word "stone" does not differ from the corresponding ones of a real or a fake (e.g. papier maché) stone.
The dichotomy observation/understanding hence cannot be upheld because there does not exist a theoretically defendable difference. What is usually expressed in language games as understanding is a historical - and often hierarchical - aspect of a particular phenomenon/association. Thus it is not surprising that Carl Popper and John C. Eccles tend to use culture-evolutionary interpretations to make pre-civilized human cultures fit in Popper´s World 1 to World 3 system of intellectual transition.
"Subliminal" selection of what we want to interpret as meaningful
The ever-present subsidiary awareness that lays behind the naive concept of "subliminal perceptions" is no more mystifying than the fact that we can walk and play musical instruments without paying direct awerness/attention to it. ...to be
Representations and properties
Representations are dependent on properties but if there are no properties (and there is certainly a philosophical lack of any such evidenvce although the concept is still popular in many camps) then there are no representations either. What should be represented (see above and below)?
The lost ghost in the machine and the psychoanalytic chameleon Mr. Nobody
There has been an all time on-going development within biology, genetics, AI research and robot technology, which narrows our view on, not only the difference between animals and humans, but also the gap between what is considered living and dead matter. Not only free will, but also properties and representations/symbols are getting all the more complicated and vanishing as their subjective meaning seems less usable in a new emerging understanding of our invironmental positioning. Although the psychoanalytic movement seems ready to confirm/adapt to this development equally fast as Freud himself changed his ideas to fit into new scientific discoveries (it was a pity he didn't get a chance to hear about Francis Crick) psychoanalysis is forever locked out from this reality. PA is doomed to hang on the back of development just as feminism and middle-class politics, without any clue on the direction (neither on the individual nor the collective/cultural level).
Psychoanalysis has survived just because of its weakest (in fact, absent) link, namely the lack of a border between folk psychology and itself. The diagnosis for psychoanalysis would consequently be borderline...
Sigmund's dream of a biological psychoanalysis was his biggest mistake...
The entire hypothesis can be read on:
EMAH, The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis
and discussed on:
KLEVIUS' HYPOTHESIS ON CONSCIOUSNESS AND AI (interactive discussion blog)